lautzo ka naye
Justice of laotze
In the 6th century, about 2500 years ago there were great philosophers in China, whose name was Lao Tzu, a legend about him that when he was born he looked very old, that is, his knowledge and experience were with him as soon as he was born.
Bizarre stories about him are also prevalent, saying that he used to ride buffalo, he had great respect in the erstwhile China Empire, when he was leaving China at the last moment, crossing the wall of China, the concierge of Poorve Waha He told them that while going to the last time, you should tell some precious lessons of life, which I should write on this wall, even today, that learning is written on the wall of China. This article in the context of Laotze justice, which teaches us how the judicial system should be in the present, was stolen once upon a robbery in the state of China in which Laotze resides. The moneylender reached the emperor, reaching the court with a request for justice to the emperor, the emperor was surprised how the theft was done in his kingdom, the emperor said that the money lender It will be judged and you will get justice, but someone else will do justice, the Emperor of China was a disciple of Laotze, he went to his master and said Gurudev has stolen a moneylender's house in my kingdom, the thief has been caught, but You have to judge it, Laotze said , do not get this work done by me, if I do justice then you will be very upset , do not put me in this mess, you should do justice yourself, but do not obey the Emperor and insist on Got down and said that you have to do justice, because of the insistence of the Emperor, Laotze agreed and said, I will do justice in the right, but whatever justice will be done you have to accept. On the second day, the meeting arrived in Laotze court, both in Lao Guay , the thief and the moneylender, who were crowned by Emperor, laotze asked the survey first thief what was the reason that you had committed a crime like theft, without fearing, the thief spoke in the moneylender's house. I was working for the last two years, he had a lot of trouble working here, he did not give salary in time, he did not give food for two days. He used to say, one day my wife got sick. I asked the moneylender and she refused to give me salary, I had to steal, after this, Laotze asked the moneylender to tell you, quickly tell the moneylender Maharaj in one day I was keeping valuables in the vault and he was watching it that night, he passed away the valuables and escaped. It should be punished harshly, hanging does not work, Loutzo for a while. Thought and said, first this money lender should be killed for fifty days and put in jail for ten days and the thief should be punished for six months and his family should be properly looked after by the emperor, the emperor should see such justice. I came in and could say that this is justice, the thief was to be hanged, but you also punished the moneylender. Laotze said that I had already told you not to do justice to me, if I do justice then you will be in trouble, you have to be in a court of justice, you have to accept, the emperor said in the confession, but why did you do this kind of justice? , Laotze said that the moneylender was punished for fifty lashes and for ten days because it created such a situation that the thief was cited for stealing, the moneylender should eat it He did not pay, did not even pay his salary, his wife was ill even though it did not help him, he himself admitted that I kept the valuables in front of him, he provoked his working person here, so also he deserves punishment. Is, the thief should be sentenced to six months so that the family should not commit a crime like theft, no matter the opposite, it had the option of coming to the emperor and complaining about moneylender. He cannot be hanged because it is not a congenital thief, it should be given a chance to improve, this incident is being discussed because the current justice system is limited to punishing the offender only, which is the punishment process. Operates on the basis of Sahinta, in which the accused statements are later, which is in the form of a form, in which the food is supplied by taking the answer of No, While it should be said that before the start of the process of the case, the statement of the accused should be taken to know the circumstances in which the crime occurred, thousands of people in our country are closed who have committed crime in anger or any social situation. There was no intention to do it, but justice is not being done to them, our punishment process is due to the provision of the British era, whose aim is only The Gentiles had to be punished, which required extensive amendment for correct justice. There is a legend in the Shiva Purana that the Indian society is known as Ahilya Salvation. The society knows only one thing about this incident, while Muni Gautam punished Indra too hard and punished Chandra Dev who was active in this incident. Had played the role, Gautam Muni has also composed Nyaya Shastra, also written in Manu Smriti that the culprit should be tested before the trial of evidences . True justice can be done if we operate the justice system by adopting social and mono-scientific process, the intention of justice should not only be punishing the criminal but it should be connected to the main stream of society, it is also written in the Bible that hate of sin Do not sinner.
key word -loutzo, nyaye,
Sincerely
Pradeep Tiwari
Advocate
7879578306
| |
x
